Three AI agents review every post -
before you publish.
Hook checks the opening line's stopping power, Voice checks the draft against your calibrated style, Virality predicts engagement based on what has performed in your niche. Nothing ships until all three approve.
What is an AI LinkedIn post analyzer?
One AI score tells you very little. Three specialist agents tell you what to fix.
A post can be interesting but off-brand, authentic but boring, or well-written but impossible to stop scrolling past. Resonate separates those jobs into specialist agents instead of asking one general-purpose model whether a post is “good.”
How it works
Hook Agent
Scores the first two lines 0-100 on stopping power. Flags scroll-past risk before the LinkedIn preview even cuts off. Suggests stronger openers grounded in your voice.
Voice Agent
Checks every sentence against your calibrated voice fingerprint. Highlights any phrase that drifts (too formal, generic AI hedging, banned words) and rewrites it inline.
Virality Agent
Predicts likes/comments/reach based on 1.8M-post training data specific to your niche and audience size. Suggests structural tweaks (line breaks, question hooks, CTA placement) proven to lift engagement.
Your first two lines decide whether people stop.
Resonate evaluates your opening lines for stopping power before LinkedIn's preview cuts off the rest of your post.
“I've been thinking a lot about leadership lately.”
“We nearly fired our best salesperson because we misread one number.”
The difference is curiosity, specificity and an information gap the reader wants closed - not just better grammar.
Score your LinkedIn post before publishing.
Analyze your LinkedIn post
Paste a draft below - this preview shows the kind of feedback Resonate gives on every post.
See what AI critique actually changes.
“Here are 5 lessons I've learned about building a startup that I think everyone should know.”
“We spent $180k building a feature nobody asked for.”
Why it improved: specificity, real tension, a concrete founder experience, and a clearer takeaway.
What makes a good LinkedIn post?
Your post doesn't get one score. It gets three.
A high-hook post can still be off-voice. A high-voice post can still be structurally weak. When the agents disagree, you see all three scores side by side and decide.
Strong hook. Good engagement potential. But it doesn't sound like you yet.
What this gets you
- Every draft carries three specialist scores - not one generic 'is this good?' verdict
- Predicted engagement range shown before you publish so you know what to expect
- Inline rewrites, not just criticism - agents propose fixes you can accept in one click
- Learns from your actual results and calibrates its predictions weekly
How this is different
Give you one score or one 'polish' pass. You have no idea whether your hook is weak, your voice is off, or your structure will bury the message.
Splits the review across three specialist agents so you know exactly what to fix. Publishing to your specific audience is a solved problem, not a guessing game.
Generic AI vs Resonate AI critique.
| Generic AI | Resonate |
|---|---|
| One general-purpose review | 3 specialist agents |
| “Make it better” | Specific diagnosis |
| Grammar and style focused | Hook + voice + engagement |
| Generic suggestions | User-specific suggestions |
| No LinkedIn context | LinkedIn-specific |
| No performance feedback | Learns from your results |
| Manual rewriting | Inline one-click fixes |
Generic AI tells you whether your writing sounds okay. Resonate tells you what to change and why.
AI critique isn't the same as grammar checking.
A grammar checker asks
Is this sentence correct?
An AI critique asks
Will the reader stop? Does this sound like you? Is the idea specific? Is the structure effective? Is there a reason to comment?
AI content critique vs human editor.
| AI critique | Human editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Seconds | Hours to days |
| Cost | Included in every plan | Higher, billed separately |
| Consistency | Every single draft | Depends on availability |
| LinkedIn-specific scoring | Depends on the editor | |
| Strategic judgment | Limited | |
| Performance feedback | Automated, weekly | Manual |
AI critique doesn't replace strategic human judgment - it makes the first-pass review dramatically faster.
How accurate is Resonate's critique?
Each score is evaluated on its own terms rather than blended into one “overall” number - a 92/100 Hook score is not a claim about virality odds.
Resonate AI critique - at a glance.
| Product type | AI LinkedIn post critique |
|---|---|
| Agents | 3 - Hook, Voice, Virality |
| Hook analysis | |
| Voice analysis | |
| Engagement prediction | |
| Inline rewriting | |
| Voice fingerprint | |
| Niche-specific analysis | |
| Performance feedback loop | |
| One-click suggestions | |
| Free trial | 14 days |
Common questions
A tool that evaluates a LinkedIn draft before you publish and identifies weaknesses in the hook, writing style, structure and engagement potential - then suggests specific fixes. Resonate does this with three specialist agents instead of one general verdict.
Hook strength, specificity, whether it sounds like you, readable structure, relevance to your audience, and whether it gives readers a reason to comment. Resonate's Hook, Voice and Virality agents check all of these automatically.
Yes. The Hook Agent scores your opening two lines on stopping power and suggests stronger, voice-consistent alternatives before LinkedIn's preview even cuts off the rest of your post.
Within ±25% of actual engagement on 82% of posts across our beta cohort. It's tuned per user - the more you publish through Resonate, the tighter the range gets as it learns your audience's actual patterns.
A grammar checker verifies correctness. AI critique evaluates whether the post will stop a scroll, sound like you, and generate a response - a different, higher-level judgment.
Yes. Agents propose inline fixes you can accept, edit, or reject one at a time - nothing is applied automatically.
Yes - you can publish direct from draft with one click. But the critique adds 4-6 seconds and typically prevents ~30% of posts you'd have regretted, so most users leave it on.
Often. A high-hook post can still be off-voice; a high-voice post can still be structurally weak. When they disagree, you see all three scores side by side and decide.
Explore more of Resonate
Every feature is part of one workflow - ideas, writing, critique, publishing and analytics. See how it fits together in the LinkedIn content generator guide, or browse all features.
It is included on every plan - see the full pricing breakdown, or how it stacks up in Resonate vs Taplio.
Try multi-agent critique free for 14 days.
$0 due today. Cancel in two clicks. 30-day money-back guarantee if you decide to stay.
Start for free